<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Simon Marketing on Chuck Grassley (non‑official)</title><link>https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/tags/simon-marketing/</link><description>Recent content in Simon Marketing on Chuck Grassley (non‑official)</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/">Home&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/about/">About&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/contact/">Contact&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/copyright-and-disclaimer/">Copyright and disclaimer&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/privacy/">Privacy&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://www.ecthrwatch.org/other-websites/">Other websites&lt;/a>&lt;br> Non‑official website on Chuck Grassley.&lt;br> &lt;a href="https://www.ECtHRwatch.org">European Court of Human Rights Watch&lt;/a></copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/tags/simon-marketing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>McDonald’s Corporation v. Simon Marketing 2002-09-16</title><link>https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/open-letters/mcdonalds-corporation-v-simons-marketing-2002-09-16/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/open-letters/mcdonalds-corporation-v-simons-marketing-2002-09-16/</guid><description>Around January 2023, I found out that McDonald’s Corporation sued their supplier under RICO.
It&amp;rsquo;s an important piece of evidence because it proves that when I would keep notifying, in 2015, McDonald’s Corporation, sternly warning them that they were committing fraud, they could only have immediately understood that the roles were now reversed: McDonald’s Corporation was now the criminal and they were engaging, via their subsidiary companies, in a pattern of racketeering activity.
“MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER</description></item></channel></rss>