<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sham trial on Chuck Grassley (non‑official)</title><link>https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/tags/sham-trial/</link><description>Recent content in Sham trial on Chuck Grassley (non‑official)</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/">Home&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/about/">About&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/contact/">Contact&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/copyright-and-disclaimer/">Copyright and disclaimer&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/privacy/">Privacy&lt;/a> | &lt;a href="https://www.ecthrwatch.org/other-websites/">Other websites&lt;/a>&lt;br> Non‑official website on Chuck Grassley.&lt;br> &lt;a href="https://www.ECtHRwatch.org">European Court of Human Rights Watch&lt;/a></copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:59:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/tags/sham-trial/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Judgement in the Civil Litigation Against McDonald’s and a Franchisee</title><link>https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/open-letters/the-sham-trial/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:59:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://chuck-grassley.usa-v-mcdonalds.com/open-letters/the-sham-trial/</guid><description>The events surrounding the civil litigation, an authentic sham trial, which happened from 2006 to 2008, have been extremely distressing, and I wish to highlight several crucial aspects.
On December 15, 2023, I submitted to the European Court of Human Rights comprehensive explanations of how I found myself in this predicament, you can access the detailed account that I have provided. Please note that the first communication I submitted to the Court has been heavily redacted and the Court&amp;rsquo;s records pertaining to this case have been sealed due to the extreme sensitiveness of some information.</description></item></channel></rss>